Immigrants from Moldova vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,017,379 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan within Immigrant from Moldova communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.724. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Moldova within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.512% in Immigrants from Kazakhstan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Moldova corresponds to an increase of 511.8 Immigrants from Kazakhstan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($56,168 compared to $53,990, a difference of 4.0%), per capita income ($47,489 compared to $48,747, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,939 compared to $62,292, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,357 compared to $107,378, a difference of 0.020%), median earnings ($50,274 compared to $50,225, a difference of 0.10%), and median family income ($109,975 compared to $110,137, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 12.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.9%), and male poverty (9.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 9.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.77%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 5.9%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and births to unmarried women (27.3% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.30%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.90%), and currently married (48.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 38.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 9.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 51.6%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 4.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 51.6%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.1%), professional degree (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.7%), and master's degree (16.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.10%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 6.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.010%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.85%).