Immigrants from Guyana vs Immigrants from Jamaica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,312,773 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica within Immigrant from Guyana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.057. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guyana within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in Immigrants from Jamaica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guyana corresponds to an increase of 33.4 Immigrants from Jamaica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($55,726 compared to $51,038, a difference of 9.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,586 compared to $83,298, a difference of 7.5%), and median household income ($80,324 compared to $75,851, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (18.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,186 compared to $87,035, a difference of 3.6%), and median family income ($92,513 compared to $89,268, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (13.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.11%), poverty (14.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and receiving food stamps (16.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 14.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (27.3% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 18.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.3% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.65%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.75%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 12.1%), births to unmarried women (35.0% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 11.0%), and single mother households (7.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (26.3% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and currently married (41.9% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 107.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 30.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (3.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.6% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 21.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.0% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 27.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (3.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 29.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 27.2%), bachelor's degree (33.9% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.66%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.67%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 17.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 0.79%), ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.1%).