Immigrants from Eritrea vs Immigrants from Jamaica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,309,445 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica within Immigrant from Eritrea communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.015. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eritrea within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Jamaica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eritrea corresponds to a decrease of 3.9 Immigrants from Jamaica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($102,823 compared to $89,268, a difference of 15.2%), per capita income ($44,509 compared to $38,766, a difference of 14.8%), and wage/income gap (21.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,574 compared to $51,038, a difference of 1.1%), median female earnings ($41,485 compared to $38,625, a difference of 7.4%), and median earnings ($47,657 compared to $43,026, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 43.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 20.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.0% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 1.4%), single female poverty (21.8% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 38.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 37.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 20.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (68.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.74%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 24.3%), births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 22.6%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.33, a difference of 2.8%), married-couple households (42.1% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 34.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 32.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.4% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 18.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 21.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 54.8%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 35.5%), and master's degree (16.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (92.5% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.13%), 9th grade (93.7% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 23.6%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 22.6%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 0.17%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.1%).