Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Jamaica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,891,423 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.359. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.052% in Immigrants from Jamaica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to an increase of 1,052.2 Immigrants from Jamaica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 16.5%), median female earnings ($41,932 compared to $38,625, a difference of 8.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,538 compared to $51,038, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($89,249 compared to $89,268, a difference of 0.020%), median household income ($76,517 compared to $75,851, a difference of 0.88%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $87,035, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 16.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.8% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.14%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (20.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 32.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 17.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and female unemployment (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 26.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.8%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and married-couple households (37.5% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.33, a difference of 0.21%), single mother households (8.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (62.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 163.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 61.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 61.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 36.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 55.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 61.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.3%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and bachelor's degree (35.0% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 30.3%), hearing disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 19.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.8% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 0.11%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 0.74%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.9%).