Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Jamaica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,343,830 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica within Immigrant from Malaysia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.113. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Malaysia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.065% in Immigrants from Jamaica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Malaysia corresponds to a decrease of 65.0 Immigrants from Jamaica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 39.6%), median family income ($115,880 compared to $89,268, a difference of 29.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,796 compared to $87,035, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,179 compared to $51,038, a difference of 6.2%), median female earnings ($43,835 compared to $38,625, a difference of 13.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,497 compared to $54,027, a difference of 21.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 62.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 32.4%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 8.2%), single male poverty (12.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 8.3%), and single mother poverty (27.3% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 39.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 31.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 47.7%), births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 41.8%), and divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.33, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 33.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 24.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.74%), no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 87.6%), professional degree (5.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 60.1%), and master's degree (18.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.17%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 24.4%), ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 23.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 2.5%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.6%).