Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Immigrants from Jamaica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,536,122 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica within Immigrant from Uzbekistan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.055. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uzbekistan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.024% in Immigrants from Jamaica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uzbekistan corresponds to an increase of 23.9 Immigrants from Jamaica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,929 compared to $38,766, a difference of 21.1%), wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 20.8%), and median male earnings ($57,941 compared to $48,040, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,331 compared to $54,027, a difference of 4.3%), householder income under 25 years ($54,846 compared to $51,038, a difference of 7.5%), and median female earnings ($43,363 compared to $38,625, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 20.4%), receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 18.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 0.50%), single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 40.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 22.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.2% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 10.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.4% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.54%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.8% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 50.4%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 42.8%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.16%), family households (63.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.33, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (26.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 87.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (12.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 22.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (3.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (73.4% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 17.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (37.9% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 17.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (3.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 45.1%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 45.0%), and master's degree (17.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.010%), 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.010%), and 10th grade (92.6% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 44.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 28.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.9%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 3.3%).