Immigrants from Taiwan vs Immigrants from Jamaica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 206,427,850 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica within Immigrant from Taiwan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.120. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Taiwan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Immigrants from Jamaica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Taiwan corresponds to a decrease of 15.8 Immigrants from Jamaica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 56.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($135,508 compared to $87,035, a difference of 55.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($129,122 compared to $83,298, a difference of 55.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($59,424 compared to $51,038, a difference of 16.4%), median female earnings ($49,256 compared to $38,625, a difference of 27.5%), and median earnings ($61,151 compared to $43,026, a difference of 42.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (7.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 130.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 82.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 79.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 9.7%), single mother poverty (23.9% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 24.1%), and single father poverty (13.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 25.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 47.3%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 40.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 78.5%), births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 68.6%), and divorced or separated (9.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.33, a difference of 2.9%), family households (68.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 84.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 70.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 7.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.7% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 34.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 50.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 134.0%), professional degree (7.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 98.2%), and master's degree (22.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 72.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.40%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.41%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (7.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 49.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 45.8%), and vision disability (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.66%), disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and cognitive disability (15.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 11.8%).