Immigrants from Saudi Arabia vs Guamanian/Chamorro Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,809,425 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros within Immigrant from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.444. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Saudi Arabia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.256% in Guamanians/Chamorros. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Saudi Arabia corresponds to an increase of 256.3 Guamanians/Chamorros.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($46,187 compared to $53,423, a difference of 15.7%), per capita income ($46,008 compared to $41,678, a difference of 10.4%), and median family income ($108,544 compared to $101,061, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($63,355 compared to $63,187, a difference of 0.26%), median household income ($86,875 compared to $86,255, a difference of 0.72%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,450 compared to $93,569, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 32.9%), male poverty (12.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 15.4%), and single male poverty (14.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.2% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 0.91%), single female poverty (21.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.9%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.0% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 24.2%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 12.2%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.29, a difference of 3.9%), currently married (44.7% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and married-couple households (44.4% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 43.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 29.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 60.5%, a difference of 11.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 28.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 66.3%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 56.1%), and master's degree (19.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 19.1%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.7%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and cognitive disability (19.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 6.2%).