Immigrants from Belgium vs Guamanian/Chamorro Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,241,748 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros within Immigrant from Belgium communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.693. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belgium within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.862% in Guamanians/Chamorros. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belgium corresponds to an increase of 1,862.4 Guamanians/Chamorros.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,082 compared to $41,678, a difference of 32.2%), median male earnings ($66,125 compared to $53,661, a difference of 23.2%), and median family income ($123,831 compared to $101,061, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,830 compared to $53,423, a difference of 2.6%), householder income over 65 years ($69,703 compared to $63,187, a difference of 10.3%), and wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 21.4%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 12.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.82%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.89%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.75%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 29.9%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 24.7%), and births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.9% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.29%), currently married (48.1% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.29, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 47.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 38.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 60.5%, a difference of 11.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 26.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.0% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 82.8%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 79.4%), and master's degree (20.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 58.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.45%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 24.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 20.7%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.5%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 8.0%).