Immigrants from Ecuador vs Guamanian/Chamorro Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,613,375 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.184. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Guamanians/Chamorros. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to an increase of 4.2 Guamanians/Chamorros.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $63,187, a difference of 17.0%), wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 15.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,462 compared to $101,170, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,644 compared to $38,717, a difference of 0.19%), householder income under 25 years ($53,722 compared to $53,423, a difference of 0.56%), and per capita income ($41,195 compared to $41,678, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 38.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 37.9%), and married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.74%), single female poverty (22.0% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 18.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 23.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.97%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (42.9% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 12.1%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 10.4%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.94%), family households (64.8% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 198.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 90.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 73.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 20.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 60.5%, a difference of 49.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 73.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 43.4%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 14.4%), and college, under 1 year (58.7% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 0.10%), bachelor's degree (34.7% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 31.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.7%), and male disability (10.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.010%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.0%).