Chickasaw vs Guamanian/Chamorro Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Guamanian/Chamorro
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Guamanians/Chamorros
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,082
SOCIAL INDEX
38.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
205th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Guamanian/Chamorro Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,786,387 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Guamanians/Chamorros. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 1.4 Guamanians/Chamorros.
Chickasaw vs Guamanian/Chamorro Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $86,255, a difference of 23.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $101,170, a difference of 23.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $93,569, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 4.6%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $53,661, a difference of 12.2%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $38,717, a difference of 12.5%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Guamanian/Chamorro |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $41,678 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Fair $101,061 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Good $86,255 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Fair $45,933 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Fair $53,661 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Poor $38,717 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $53,423 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Fair $93,569 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Good $101,170 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $63,187 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Fair 26.0% |
Chickasaw vs Guamanian/Chamorro Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 33.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 32.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.10%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.2%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Guamanian/Chamorro |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Good 12.1% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Good 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Good 13.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Average 13.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Excellent 16.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Good 15.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Good 16.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Good 15.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Fair 29.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Excellent 4.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Excellent 10.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Average 11.7% |
Chickasaw vs Guamanian/Chamorro Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 23.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Guamanian/Chamorro |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.5% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Poor 5.4% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Poor 17.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Fair 6.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Fair 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Fair 7.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Fair 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Chickasaw vs Guamanian/Chamorro Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Guamanian/Chamorro |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 38.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 76.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 83.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 81.6% |
Chickasaw vs Guamanian/Chamorro Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 15.8%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 14.7%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.29, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (64.4% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 3.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Guamanian/Chamorro |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 66.6% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 29.7% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 48.1% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.29 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Poor 6.6% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Good 47.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Poor 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Average 31.6% |
Chickasaw vs Guamanian/Chamorro Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 8.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 60.5%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.17%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 60.5%, a difference of 2.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Guamanian/Chamorro |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 92.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 60.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 23.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Chickasaw vs Guamanian/Chamorro Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.0%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 14.7%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.14%), 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.47%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.49%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Guamanian/Chamorro |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Fair 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Fair 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Fair 97.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Fair 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Fair 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Fair 97.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Fair 97.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Fair 97.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Fair 97.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Fair 95.9% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Fair 94.8% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Average 92.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Fair 91.0% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Fair 88.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Fair 85.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Average 65.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Fair 58.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 43.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 34.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 13.1% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.6% |
Chickasaw vs Guamanian/Chamorro Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 41.3%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 39.7%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.1%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Guamanian/Chamorro |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.3% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 12.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Average 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 25.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 49.4% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.3% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Poor 6.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |