Immigrants from Caribbean vs Guamanian/Chamorro Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,768,034 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros within Immigrant from Caribbean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.216. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Caribbean within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Guamanians/Chamorros. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Caribbean corresponds to a decrease of 0.9 Guamanians/Chamorros.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($48,535 compared to $63,187, a difference of 30.2%), wage/income gap (20.4% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 27.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,513 compared to $101,170, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,757 compared to $53,423, a difference of 5.2%), median female earnings ($36,414 compared to $38,717, a difference of 6.3%), and median earnings ($41,119 compared to $45,933, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (19.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 68.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 57.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.57%), single female poverty (22.4% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and single mother poverty (31.1% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 16.4%), male unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.2% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 22.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.8% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 26.0%), births to unmarried women (39.8% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 25.9%), and married-couple households (40.8% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.33 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.1%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (65.3% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 145.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 81.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 59.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (80.4% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 14.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.2% compared to 60.5%, a difference of 36.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 59.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 35.1%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 25.8%), and college, under 1 year (56.6% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.82%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.82%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 25.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 20.2%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.2%), female disability (12.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability (12.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.1%).