Immigrants from Bahamas vs Guamanian/Chamorro Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,583,332 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros within Immigrant from Bahamas communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.119. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bahamas within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.066% in Guamanians/Chamorros. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bahamas corresponds to a decrease of 65.9 Guamanians/Chamorros.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 23.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($76,910 compared to $93,569, a difference of 21.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,177 compared to $101,170, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,027 compared to $38,717, a difference of 10.5%), per capita income ($37,193 compared to $41,678, a difference of 12.1%), and median earnings ($39,861 compared to $45,933, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 37.6%), receiving food stamps (15.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 35.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (22.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 4.0%), single mother poverty (31.1% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 23.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 13.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (40.1% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 26.8%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 20.1%), and married-couple households (41.7% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.71%), family households (63.6% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 4.7%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 53.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 33.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 60.5%, a difference of 15.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 23.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in college, under 1 year (61.1% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 7.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and college, 1 year or more (55.2% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.9% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.060%), 5th grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and 4th grade (97.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 12.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.29%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.2%).