Luxembourger vs Guamanian/Chamorro Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Guamanian/Chamorro
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Guamanians/Chamorros

Excellent
Fair
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,082
SOCIAL INDEX
38.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
205th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Guamanian/Chamorro Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,071,672 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.568. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.295% in Guamanians/Chamorros. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 295.3 Guamanians/Chamorros.
Luxembourger Integration in Guamanian/Chamorro Communities

Luxembourger vs Guamanian/Chamorro Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,663 compared to $41,678, a difference of 9.6%), householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $53,423, a difference of 6.0%), and wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($86,418 compared to $86,255, a difference of 0.19%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,536 compared to $101,170, a difference of 2.3%), and median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $38,717, a difference of 3.0%).
Luxembourger vs Guamanian/Chamorro Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerGuamanian/Chamorro
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Tragic
$41,678
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Fair
$101,061
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Good
$86,255
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Fair
$45,933
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Fair
$53,661
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Poor
$38,717
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Exceptional
$53,423
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Fair
$93,569
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Good
$101,170
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Exceptional
$63,187
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Fair
26.0%

Luxembourger vs Guamanian/Chamorro Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 27.8%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.3%), and family poverty (7.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 3.2%), single female poverty (20.4% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 7.7%).
Luxembourger vs Guamanian/Chamorro Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerGuamanian/Chamorro
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Good
12.1%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Good
8.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Good
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Good
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Exceptional
19.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Average
13.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Excellent
16.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Good
15.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Good
16.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Good
15.9%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Fair
29.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Excellent
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Excellent
10.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Average
11.7%

Luxembourger vs Guamanian/Chamorro Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.5%), unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 26.2%), and male unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.3%).
Luxembourger vs Guamanian/Chamorro Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerGuamanian/Chamorro
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Poor
5.4%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Fair
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Average
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.8%

Luxembourger vs Guamanian/Chamorro Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 18.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.9% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 3.5%).
Luxembourger vs Guamanian/Chamorro Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerGuamanian/Chamorro
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Exceptional
38.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Exceptional
76.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Tragic
83.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
81.6%

Luxembourger vs Guamanian/Chamorro Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 19.6%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 15.6%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.5% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.86%), currently married (49.3% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and family households (63.3% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 5.3%).
Luxembourger vs Guamanian/Chamorro Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerGuamanian/Chamorro
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
66.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
29.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Exceptional
48.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Good
47.1%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Average
31.6%

Luxembourger vs Guamanian/Chamorro Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 49.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 21.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 60.5%, a difference of 2.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 11.3%).
Luxembourger vs Guamanian/Chamorro Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerGuamanian/Chamorro
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
8.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
92.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Exceptional
60.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Exceptional
23.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
8.1%

Luxembourger vs Guamanian/Chamorro Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 35.4%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 21.4%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.62%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.63%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.64%).
Luxembourger vs Guamanian/Chamorro Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerGuamanian/Chamorro
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Fair
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Fair
97.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Fair
95.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Fair
94.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Average
92.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Fair
91.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Fair
88.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Fair
85.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Average
65.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Fair
58.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
43.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Tragic
34.6%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Tragic
13.1%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
1.6%

Luxembourger vs Guamanian/Chamorro Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 18.2%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.4%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 0.60%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 7.0%).
Luxembourger vs Guamanian/Chamorro Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerGuamanian/Chamorro
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.3%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
25.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
49.4%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%