Fijian vs German Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,555,113 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of German Russians within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.386. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in German Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to a decrease of 4.4 German Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $45,673, a difference of 9.8%), per capita income ($36,690 compared to $40,266, a difference of 9.8%), and median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $49,924, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($74,205 compared to $75,856, a difference of 2.2%), householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $55,356, a difference of 2.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,187 compared to $89,398, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 25.8%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.5%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.6% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 0.98%), female poverty (14.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 28.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 26.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.48%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.0%), family households with children (29.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 8.3%), and family households (65.9% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.3% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 1.7%), births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and married-couple households (46.1% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.1%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 10.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 57.0%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 35.6%), and no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.69%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 36.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 10.4%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.4%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.6%).