Immigrants from Lithuania vs German Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,832,316 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of German Russians within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.911. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.280% in German Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to an increase of 280.4 German Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,336 compared to $89,398, a difference of 27.9%), median household income ($96,836 compared to $75,856, a difference of 27.7%), and per capita income ($51,361 compared to $40,266, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 16.2%), median female earnings ($43,317 compared to $37,105, a difference of 16.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,087 compared to $55,356, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.4% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 44.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 35.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 11.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 13.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 8.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 14.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 26.9%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.4%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.10%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.24%), and family households (63.9% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 23.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 11.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 0.42%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.71%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 40.5%), master's degree (18.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 37.3%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.10%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 29.9%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 28.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (44.9% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 5.4%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.9%).