Pima vs German Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,894,624 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of German Russians within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.848. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in German Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 6.5 German Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $40,266, a difference of 31.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $89,398, a difference of 21.8%), and median family income ($77,431 compared to $93,858, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $85,220, a difference of 2.9%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $37,105, a difference of 5.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $55,356, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 130.2%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 94.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 94.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 12.9%), single father poverty (14.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 19.8%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 23.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 152.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 121.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 118.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 9.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 24.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 16.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 12.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 75.2%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 55.6%), and currently married (35.9% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.1%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and family households (65.9% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 34.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 54.4%), associate's degree (30.2% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 49.2%), and master's degree (9.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 57.9%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 53.4%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 44.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.4%).