Immigrants from Portugal vs German Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,630,971 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of German Russians within Immigrant from Portugal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.293. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Portugal within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in German Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Portugal corresponds to an increase of 4.0 German Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,105 compared to $45,673, a difference of 18.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,512 compared to $85,220, a difference of 12.1%), and median household income ($84,740 compared to $75,856, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,924 compared to $55,356, a difference of 1.0%), per capita income ($42,412 compared to $40,266, a difference of 5.3%), and median female earnings ($39,788 compared to $37,105, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.5% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 52.1%), receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 21.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (17.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.060%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and family poverty (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 25.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 22.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.94%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.7%), births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 9.3%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.2% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.64%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.65%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 13.9%), no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 11.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 45.6%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 17.2%), and college, 1 year or more (51.9% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.90%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.91%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.5%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 10.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.41%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.49%), and disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.79%).