Immigrants from Southern Europe vs German Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,499,054 people shows no correlation between the proportion of German Russians within Immigrant from Southern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.005. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Southern Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in German Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Southern Europe corresponds to an increase of 0.1 German Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,486 compared to $85,220, a difference of 21.4%), median household income ($91,605 compared to $75,856, a difference of 20.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,775 compared to $89,398, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 7.3%), householder income over 65 years ($61,902 compared to $55,356, a difference of 11.8%), and median female earnings ($42,275 compared to $37,105, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 38.6%), single female poverty (19.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 20.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.6%), receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 16.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.5%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 9.8%), and births to unmarried women (31.1% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.48%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.96%), and currently married (46.9% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 23.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 21.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 26.9%), master's degree (16.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 23.4%), and no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.38%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 16.1%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 15.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.3%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and female disability (12.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.4%).