Immigrants from Central America vs German Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,721,830 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of German Russians within Immigrant from Central America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.251. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Central America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in German Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Central America corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 German Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,974 compared to $40,266, a difference of 15.1%), householder income under 25 years ($51,022 compared to $45,673, a difference of 11.7%), and median family income ($85,050 compared to $93,858, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 0.070%), median household income ($74,217 compared to $75,856, a difference of 2.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,420 compared to $55,356, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 50.0%), family poverty (12.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 28.4%), and receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 0.99%), single female poverty (24.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and single mother poverty (33.6% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 25.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 6.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 21.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 25.9%), single mother households (8.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 20.8%), and family households with children (31.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.67%), currently married (44.1% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and married-couple households (45.7% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 21.5%), no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 18.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 97.1%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 49.4%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 32.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.9%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and female disability (12.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.9%).