Russian vs Colville Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,263,125 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Colville within Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.799. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.237% in Colville. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Russians corresponds to an increase of 237.2 Colville.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Russian and Colville communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,328 compared to $82,474, a difference of 41.0%), median family income ($120,487 compared to $85,792, a difference of 40.4%), and median household income ($98,008 compared to $70,094, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,389 compared to $49,774, a difference of 9.3%), median female earnings ($44,169 compared to $37,514, a difference of 17.7%), and median earnings ($53,334 compared to $42,151, a difference of 26.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Russian and Colville communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 90.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.8% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 75.0%), and family poverty (7.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 74.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 29.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 30.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 35.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Russian and Colville communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 68.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 68.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 67.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Russian and Colville communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Russian and Colville communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 64.3%), births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 61.7%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 0.37%), average family size (3.12 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.45%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Russian and Colville communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 86.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 36.8%), and no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 1.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 86.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Russian and Colville communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (19.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 67.9%), professional degree (6.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 65.4%), and bachelor's degree (45.3% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 56.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.12%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Russian and Colville communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 140.1%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 68.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 55.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 11.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 21.2%).