Australian vs Colville Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,990,119 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Colville within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.916. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.521% in Colville. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 520.7 Colville.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Colville communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($118,440 compared to $85,792, a difference of 38.1%), median household income ($96,490 compared to $70,094, a difference of 37.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,533 compared to $82,474, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $49,774, a difference of 8.0%), median female earnings ($43,308 compared to $37,514, a difference of 15.4%), and median earnings ($52,294 compared to $42,151, a difference of 24.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Colville communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 90.4%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 66.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 65.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 32.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 35.8%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 35.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Colville communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 72.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 70.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 70.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Colville communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Colville communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 53.4%), single father households (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 51.4%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.18%), family households (62.8% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 0.49%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Colville communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 70.0%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 35.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 1.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 86.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 28.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Colville communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 58.0%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 53.8%), and bachelor's degree (44.0% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 51.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.17%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Colville communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 138.0%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 68.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 6.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 17.4%).