Comanche vs Colville Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,893,442 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Colville within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.092% in Colville. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 91.6 Colville.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Colville communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 17.6%), householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $51,739, a difference of 6.1%), and median household income ($73,747 compared to $70,094, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($38,088 compared to $38,047, a difference of 0.11%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,152 compared to $82,604, a difference of 0.55%), and median male earnings ($48,202 compared to $48,516, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Colville communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 38.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 22.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.0% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and female poverty (16.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Colville communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 57.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 46.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Colville communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Colville communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 30.0%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 23.4%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 0.50%), currently married (45.0% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.14, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Colville communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 64.1%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 33.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 1.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 86.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Colville communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (31.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 10.0%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 8.4%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.19%), ged/equivalency (83.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Colville communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 164.2%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 35.0%), and male disability (14.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 4.7%).