Pima vs Colville Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 20,697,471 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Colville within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.062% in Colville. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 61.6 Colville.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Colville communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $38,047, a difference of 24.2%), median male earnings ($42,357 compared to $48,516, a difference of 14.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $82,474, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $82,604, a difference of 0.26%), wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 0.80%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $51,739, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Colville communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 81.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 57.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (19.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 46.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 1.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and receiving food stamps (19.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Colville communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 89.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 58.3%), and female unemployment (9.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 54.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (16.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Colville communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Colville communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 26.7%), currently married (35.9% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 20.9%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.14, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 3.2%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households (65.9% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Colville communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 41.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 16.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 86.8%, a difference of 0.56%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Colville communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (30.2% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 27.5%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 25.9%), and bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.0%), 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.010%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Colville communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 209.4%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 44.0%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.19%), ambulatory disability (8.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and disability age over 75 (55.8% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 0.82%).