Luxembourger vs Cheyenne Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cheyenne
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Cheyenne

Excellent
Poor
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,791
SOCIAL INDEX
15.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
287th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cheyenne Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,674,129 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Cheyenne within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.759. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.797% in Cheyenne. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 796.6 Cheyenne.
Luxembourger Integration in Cheyenne Communities

Luxembourger vs Cheyenne Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,536 compared to $76,362, a difference of 35.6%), median family income ($106,183 compared to $81,385, a difference of 30.5%), and per capita income ($45,663 compared to $35,276, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $45,275, a difference of 11.3%), median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $35,673, a difference of 11.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $54,096, a difference of 12.7%).
Luxembourger vs Cheyenne Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerCheyenne
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Tragic
$35,276
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Tragic
$81,385
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Tragic
$66,974
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Tragic
$40,233
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Tragic
$46,062
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Tragic
$35,673
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Tragic
$45,275
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Tragic
$79,152
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Tragic
$76,362
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Tragic
$54,096
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
23.3%

Luxembourger vs Cheyenne Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 143.3%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 97.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.9% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 90.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.4%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 20.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 34.9%).
Luxembourger vs Cheyenne Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerCheyenne
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
18.9%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
14.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
17.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
20.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
28.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
19.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
28.3%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
25.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
25.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Tragic
30.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Tragic
16.7%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Tragic
38.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
9.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
13.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
14.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
14.3%

Luxembourger vs Cheyenne Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 150.0%), male unemployment (4.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 115.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 97.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.4%).
Luxembourger vs Cheyenne Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerCheyenne
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
8.0%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
9.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.6%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
14.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
22.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
8.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
8.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
16.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
7.8%

Luxembourger vs Cheyenne Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 19.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 9.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.9% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 7.7%).
Luxembourger vs Cheyenne Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerCheyenne
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
62.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Exceptional
37.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Tragic
73.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Tragic
81.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Tragic
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
77.6%

Luxembourger vs Cheyenne Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 45.5%), births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 40.5%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 0.19%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.47, a difference of 12.0%).
Luxembourger vs Cheyenne Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerCheyenne
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Tragic
63.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
42.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Exceptional
3.47
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
8.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
42.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Tragic
41.3%

Luxembourger vs Cheyenne Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 118.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 25.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 6.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 8.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 8.7%).
Luxembourger vs Cheyenne Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerCheyenne
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
11.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Poor
54.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Exceptional
22.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
8.3%

Luxembourger vs Cheyenne Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 36.7%), bachelor's degree (39.8% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 35.0%), and no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.11%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.13%).
Luxembourger vs Cheyenne Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerCheyenne
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Average
94.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
91.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Tragic
89.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Tragic
87.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Tragic
82.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
60.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
54.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
38.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Tragic
29.4%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Tragic
11.2%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
1.6%

Luxembourger vs Cheyenne Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 59.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 45.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 8.5%), female disability (11.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 12.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.0%).
Luxembourger vs Cheyenne Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerCheyenne
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.0%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
31.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
50.9%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
3.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
4.0%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
6.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%