Argentinean vs Cheyenne Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,305,391 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Cheyenne within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.088. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Cheyenne. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to a decrease of 5.9 Cheyenne.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,103 compared to $76,362, a difference of 44.2%), per capita income ($49,862 compared to $35,276, a difference of 41.3%), and median household income ($93,960 compared to $66,974, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 15.7%), median female earnings ($41,952 compared to $35,673, a difference of 17.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,154 compared to $45,275, a difference of 19.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 85.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.4% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 84.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 79.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 5.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 10.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 143.1%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 94.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 92.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 13.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 38.4%), births to unmarried women (30.0% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 37.9%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (65.0% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.47, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 34.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 19.8%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.19%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 66.9%), master's degree (18.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 61.9%), and bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.8% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.10%), 10th grade (93.7% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 54.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 46.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 7.1%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 10.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.6%).