Crow vs Cheyenne Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,512,979 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Cheyenne within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.309. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.208% in Cheyenne. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 208.2 Cheyenne.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 22.4%), per capita income ($31,729 compared to $35,276, a difference of 11.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,337 compared to $79,152, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $35,673, a difference of 1.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $76,362, a difference of 2.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $45,275, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (30.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 81.3%), single male poverty (23.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 44.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (22.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (26.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 0.34%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 0.34%), and married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 204.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 198.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 85.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.56%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (8.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and male unemployment (10.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.3%), average family size (3.82 compared to 3.47, a difference of 10.1%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.020%), married-couple households (41.4% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 6.4%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.66%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 0.99%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.1%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 12.4%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.45%), college, under 1 year (60.2% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 0.65%), and high school diploma (88.4% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 24.0%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 22.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.49%), male disability (13.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.63%), and disability (12.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.88%).