Cuban vs Cheyenne Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,736,054 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cheyenne within Cuban communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.012. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cubans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Cheyenne. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cubans corresponds to a decrease of 0.2 Cheyenne.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cuban and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,301 compared to $76,362, a difference of 13.0%), householder income under 25 years ($50,655 compared to $45,275, a difference of 11.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,152 compared to $54,096, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 0.26%), median earnings ($40,619 compared to $40,233, a difference of 0.96%), and median male earnings ($46,580 compared to $46,062, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cuban and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 63.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.1% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 48.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.71%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 16.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cuban and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 163.8%), male unemployment (4.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 112.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 102.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cuban and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 19.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.5% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cuban and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 12.8%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 12.3%), and divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.76%), births to unmarried women (39.4% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and currently married (44.6% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 39.0%), no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 37.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cuban and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 21.7%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 15.2%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (88.9% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.82%), ged/equivalency (82.0% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.82%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 39.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 36.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.4%), female disability (12.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 7.3%).