Guatemalan vs Cheyenne Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,379,013 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Cheyenne within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.641. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Cheyenne. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to an increase of 28.0 Cheyenne.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,705 compared to $76,362, a difference of 14.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $45,275, a difference of 13.8%), and median household income ($75,961 compared to $66,974, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,695 compared to $35,673, a difference of 0.060%), householder income over 65 years ($54,526 compared to $54,096, a difference of 0.80%), and median male earnings ($46,736 compared to $46,062, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 36.0%), married-couple family poverty (7.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 34.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.6% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.39%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 0.64%), and receiving food stamps (14.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 117.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 75.5%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 73.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 11.4%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.5%), currently married (42.9% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.40 compared to 3.47, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 19.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 13.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 0.41%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.50%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 67.4%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 12.4%), and high school diploma (82.0% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (38.5% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 0.42%), nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and kindergarten (96.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 41.1%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 31.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.13%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 3.8%).