Australian vs Cheyenne Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,056,009 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Cheyenne within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.072. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Cheyenne. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 9.0 Cheyenne.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,533 compared to $76,362, a difference of 48.7%), per capita income ($52,074 compared to $35,276, a difference of 47.6%), and median family income ($118,440 compared to $81,385, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $45,275, a difference of 18.7%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 20.8%), and median female earnings ($43,308 compared to $35,673, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 118.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 82.9%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 82.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 6.3%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 27.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 29.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 144.0%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 95.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 92.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 45.2%), births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 40.0%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 0.50%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.47, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 26.3%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 16.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 65.8%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 63.8%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 50.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 41.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 9.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 9.9%).