Pima vs Cajun Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,372,000 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.681. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Cajuns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 22.6 Cajuns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 60.5%), median male earnings ($42,357 compared to $52,325, a difference of 23.5%), and per capita income ($30,644 compared to $37,527, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $82,393, a difference of 0.52%), householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $51,397, a difference of 1.7%), and median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $34,034, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 103.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 70.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (19.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 66.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (30.3% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 1.0%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and single male poverty (20.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 120.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 89.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 74.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 18.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (14.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 18.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 10.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 70.1%), currently married (35.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 31.2%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 67.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 32.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 6.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 57.7%, a difference of 10.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 27.7%), associate's degree (30.2% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 23.6%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.12%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 51.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 38.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (14.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 0.50%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.6%).