Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Cajun Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,154,384 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cajuns within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.040. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Cajuns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to a decrease of 5.3 Cajuns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 33.7%), median household income ($89,496 compared to $70,605, a difference of 26.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,992 compared to $83,015, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($57,352 compared to $52,325, a difference of 9.6%), householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $45,338, a difference of 14.5%), and median earnings ($48,913 compared to $42,189, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 58.5%), single female poverty (20.0% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 53.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.8% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 15.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 19.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 29.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 38.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 35.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 0.50%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 35.0%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 19.0%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.3% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 0.090%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.32%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 16.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 57.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.96%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 59.0%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 56.3%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 50.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 46.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 44.0%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 50.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 22.4%).