Russian vs Cajun Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,997,018 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns within Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.928. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.067% in Cajuns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Russians corresponds to an increase of 66.7 Cajuns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Russian and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,154 compared to $37,527, a difference of 41.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,328 compared to $83,015, a difference of 40.1%), and median household income ($98,008 compared to $70,605, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,389 compared to $45,338, a difference of 20.0%), wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 21.0%), and median male earnings ($63,939 compared to $52,325, a difference of 22.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Russian and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 64.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 63.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 63.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 18.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 20.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 29.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Russian and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 40.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 27.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Russian and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Russian and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 46.2%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 38.9%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.12 compared to 3.17, a difference of 1.6%), family households (63.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and currently married (48.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Russian and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 37.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 57.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.33%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Russian and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 87.8%), master's degree (19.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 78.2%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 75.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%), 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Russian and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 51.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 50.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 8.4%), disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 50.7%, a difference of 11.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 17.4%).