Chickasaw vs Cajun Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Cajun
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Cajuns
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,029
SOCIAL INDEX
17.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
275th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Cajun Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,670,556 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.340. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.055% in Cajuns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 54.8 Cajuns.
Chickasaw vs Cajun Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 24.7%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $52,325, a difference of 9.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $82,393, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($70,005 compared to $70,605, a difference of 0.86%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $83,015, a difference of 1.0%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $34,034, a difference of 1.1%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Cajun |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $37,527 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $87,157 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $70,605 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $42,189 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Poor $52,325 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $34,034 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $45,338 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $82,393 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $83,015 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $51,397 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 33.9% |
Chickasaw vs Cajun Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (19.0% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 21.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 20.2%), and single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 3.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 4.5%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Cajun |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 11.9% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.9% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 17.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 25.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 19.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 24.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 22.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 22.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 22.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 19.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 30.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 23.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 40.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 13.7% |
Chickasaw vs Cajun Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 70.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 26.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Cajun |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.7% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 19.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 12.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.7% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 12.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 10.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Chickasaw vs Cajun Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.99%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.82%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Cajun |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 61.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 75.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 37.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Average 75.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 82.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 82.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 81.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 78.1% |
Chickasaw vs Cajun Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 12.9%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.1%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.44%), family households (64.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.56%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 0.98%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Cajun |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Excellent 64.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Excellent 27.7% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Average 46.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.17 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.3% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Good 47.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 13.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 41.0% |
Chickasaw vs Cajun Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 24.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.64%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 7.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Cajun |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 57.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 6.0% |
Chickasaw vs Cajun Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in college, under 1 year (60.4% compared to 57.3%, a difference of 5.4%), college, 1 year or more (53.3% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.010%), 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%), and 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.010%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Cajun |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Good 95.1% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Poor 93.4% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 91.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 89.1% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 87.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 82.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 57.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 51.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 37.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 29.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 11.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Chickasaw vs Cajun Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 13.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 9.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 50.7%, a difference of 1.1%), female disability (15.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.9%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Cajun |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 14.6% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 14.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 15.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 27.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 50.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 17.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 7.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.9% |