Australian vs Cajun Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,864,774 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.994. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.509% in Cajuns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 508.5 Cajuns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $37,527, a difference of 38.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,533 compared to $83,015, a difference of 36.8%), and median household income ($96,490 compared to $70,605, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $45,338, a difference of 18.5%), median male earnings ($62,857 compared to $52,325, a difference of 20.1%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 20.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 56.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 55.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.4% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 19.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 21.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 23.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 42.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 27.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 38.7%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 31.7%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.0%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.17, a difference of 1.3%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 19.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 57.7%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 74.6%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 67.7%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 65.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.050%), 3rd grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 48.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 42.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.7%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 50.7%, a difference of 10.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 16.4%).