Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Bangladeshi Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,855,152 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis within Immigrant from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.111. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.019% in Bangladeshis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia corresponds to a decrease of 19.3 Bangladeshis.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($91,541 compared to $74,112, a difference of 23.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($100,283 compared to $81,363, a difference of 23.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,109 compared to $86,402, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 11.9%), median female earnings ($40,558 compared to $35,960, a difference of 12.8%), and median earnings ($47,671 compared to $41,263, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 35.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 31.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and single father poverty (14.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 12.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 42.5%, a difference of 19.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 29.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 27.5%), and births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.36 compared to 3.37, a difference of 0.31%), family households with children (29.1% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (67.5% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 8.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.6% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.070%), no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.76%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.6% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 42.0%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 33.3%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (94.5% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.010%), 8th grade (94.2% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and 11th grade (90.9% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 29.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 17.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.3% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 1.5%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 7.0%).