New Zealander vs Bangladeshi Community Comparison

COMPARE

New Zealander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Bangladeshi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

New Zealanders

Bangladeshis

Excellent
Fair
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,611
SOCIAL INDEX
23.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
249th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Bangladeshi Integration in New Zealander Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,159,373 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.100. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.503% in Bangladeshis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 503.4 Bangladeshis.
New Zealander Integration in Bangladeshi Communities

New Zealander vs Bangladeshi Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $35,897, a difference of 40.9%), median male earnings ($61,199 compared to $46,744, a difference of 30.9%), and median family income ($115,230 compared to $88,358, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $47,589, a difference of 12.0%), median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $35,960, a difference of 18.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,333 compared to $54,719, a difference of 23.1%).
New Zealander vs Bangladeshi Income
Income MetricNew ZealanderBangladeshi
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$50,575
Tragic
$35,897
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,230
Tragic
$88,358
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,146
Tragic
$74,112
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,246
Tragic
$41,263
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,199
Tragic
$46,744
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,446
Tragic
$35,960
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,294
Tragic
$47,589
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,085
Tragic
$81,363
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,286
Tragic
$86,402
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$67,333
Tragic
$54,719
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Exceptional
22.2%

New Zealander vs Bangladeshi Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 51.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 35.1%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 3.5%).
New Zealander vs Bangladeshi Poverty
Poverty MetricNew ZealanderBangladeshi
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
14.8%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
10.9%
Males
Excellent
10.8%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
16.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.7%
Tragic
22.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Tragic
15.9%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.6%
Tragic
20.6%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.3%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Tragic
20.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.6%
Tragic
20.0%
Single Males
Poor
13.2%
Tragic
13.3%
Single Females
Average
21.0%
Tragic
24.2%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.6%
Exceptional
15.2%
Single Mothers
Average
29.1%
Tragic
31.7%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
15.0%

New Zealander vs Bangladeshi Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 18.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 16.4%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.65%).
New Zealander vs Bangladeshi Unemployment
Unemployment MetricNew ZealanderBangladeshi
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Exceptional
16.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Average
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Good
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Fair
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
7.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Good
5.3%

New Zealander vs Bangladeshi Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 42.5%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.37%).
New Zealander vs Bangladeshi Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricNew ZealanderBangladeshi
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Exceptional
42.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.2%
Exceptional
78.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.6%
Tragic
81.3%

New Zealander vs Bangladeshi Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 46.9%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 44.9%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.9% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.2%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.37, a difference of 6.8%).
New Zealander vs Bangladeshi Family Structure
Family Structure MetricNew ZealanderBangladeshi
Family Households
Tragic
62.9%
Average
64.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Exceptional
30.1%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.2%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Exceptional
3.37
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
8.1%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.4%
Tragic
43.7%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.3%
Tragic
34.4%

New Zealander vs Bangladeshi Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 17.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 16.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 7.4%).
New Zealander vs Bangladeshi Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricNew ZealanderBangladeshi
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.2%
Exceptional
8.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.7%
Exceptional
58.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.4%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
7.6%

New Zealander vs Bangladeshi Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 111.9%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 106.8%), and professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 92.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.9%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.9%).
New Zealander vs Bangladeshi Education Level
Education Level MetricNew ZealanderBangladeshi
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
3.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
95.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
95.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
94.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Tragic
93.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
92.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Tragic
90.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.8%
Tragic
89.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Tragic
86.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Tragic
83.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.2%
Tragic
61.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Tragic
54.5%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.8%
Tragic
40.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.0%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.3%
Tragic
10.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
1.2%

New Zealander vs Bangladeshi Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 24.3%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 22.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.41%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 6.7%).
New Zealander vs Bangladeshi Disability
Disability MetricNew ZealanderBangladeshi
Disability
Excellent
11.5%
Tragic
12.6%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.0%
Tragic
13.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
22.9%
Tragic
26.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
49.4%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Fair
17.4%
Tragic
18.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.8%