Australian vs Bangladeshi Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,903,011 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.595. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.904% in Bangladeshis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 1,904.4 Bangladeshis.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $35,897, a difference of 45.1%), median male earnings ($62,857 compared to $46,744, a difference of 34.5%), and median family income ($118,440 compared to $88,358, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $47,589, a difference of 12.9%), median female earnings ($43,308 compared to $35,960, a difference of 20.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $54,719, a difference of 22.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 56.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 39.4%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 3.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 15.9%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.1%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.73%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 42.5%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 46.1%), single father households (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 41.1%), and births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.2%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.37, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 16.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 15.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 118.9%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 97.9%), and professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 90.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 26.7%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 22.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.010%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and male disability (11.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 6.8%).