Chickasaw vs Bangladeshi Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Bangladeshi
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Bangladeshis
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,611
SOCIAL INDEX
23.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
249th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Bangladeshi Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,790,821 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.001. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Bangladeshis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 0.3 Bangladeshis.
Chickasaw vs Bangladeshi Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 22.5%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $47,589, a difference of 6.3%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $74,112, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($40,672 compared to $41,263, a difference of 1.5%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $35,897, a difference of 1.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $54,719, a difference of 1.8%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Bangladeshi |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $35,897 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $88,358 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $74,112 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $41,263 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $46,744 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $35,960 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $47,589 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $81,363 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $86,402 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $54,719 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 22.2% |
Chickasaw vs Bangladeshi Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 24.8%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 22.3%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.46%), female poverty (15.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 0.89%), and poverty (14.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 1.0%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Bangladeshi |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 14.8% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 16.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 22.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 15.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 20.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 20.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 20.0% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 13.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 24.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 31.7% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Fair 11.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 15.0% |
Chickasaw vs Bangladeshi Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 30.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 19.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.63%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Bangladeshi |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Average 11.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Average 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Good 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Fair 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Good 7.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Good 5.3% |
Chickasaw vs Bangladeshi Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 42.5%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Bangladeshi |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 65.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Poor 79.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 42.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 78.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Poor 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 81.3% |
Chickasaw vs Bangladeshi Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 15.7%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 15.5%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.23%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 5.5%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 5.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Bangladeshi |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Average 64.3% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 30.1% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 43.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.37 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 3.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 8.1% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 43.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Poor 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 34.4% |
Chickasaw vs Bangladeshi Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 10.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.97%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 0.98%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 1.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Bangladeshi |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 58.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 21.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Chickasaw vs Bangladeshi Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 109.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 24.6%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 0.68%), ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.90%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 1.2%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Bangladeshi |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 3.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 95.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 95.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 94.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 94.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 93.4% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 92.2% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 90.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 89.3% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 86.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 83.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 61.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 54.5% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 40.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 30.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 10.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.2% |
Chickasaw vs Bangladeshi Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 41.4%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 35.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 0.63%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 3.6%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Bangladeshi |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 12.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Poor 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 13.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 26.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 49.4% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Poor 6.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.8% |