Immigrants from Grenada vs Bangladeshi Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,755,108 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.175. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Bangladeshis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to a decrease of 8.3 Bangladeshis.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 37.1%), median female earnings ($41,932 compared to $35,960, a difference of 16.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,538 compared to $47,589, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $86,402, a difference of 0.99%), median family income ($89,249 compared to $88,358, a difference of 1.0%), and median household income ($76,517 compared to $74,112, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 49.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 41.2%), and married-couple family poverty (7.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (20.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.28%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 52.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 44.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 42.5%, a difference of 67.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 16.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.92%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 53.3%), family households with children (25.2% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 19.5%), and married-couple households (37.5% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.16%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.37, a difference of 0.81%), and family households (62.6% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 332.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 176.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 140.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 45.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 103.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 140.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 33.2%), no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 28.5%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (94.3% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.070%), college, 1 year or more (54.4% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and 7th grade (94.8% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 44.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 38.2%), and disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.15%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 4.0%).