Immigrants from Central America vs Bangladeshi Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,152,499 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis within Immigrant from Central America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.235. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Central America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Bangladeshis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Central America corresponds to a decrease of 6.9 Bangladeshis.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 11.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,022 compared to $47,589, a difference of 7.2%), and median female earnings ($33,953 compared to $35,960, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($74,217 compared to $74,112, a difference of 0.14%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,965 compared to $86,402, a difference of 0.51%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,012 compared to $81,363, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 25.0%), married-couple family poverty (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 0.28%), male poverty (13.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and single female poverty (24.8% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 28.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.8%), and female unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 42.5%, a difference of 21.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 8.8%), family households (68.3% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and married-couple households (45.7% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.1% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 1.0%), single mother households (8.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 12.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 7.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.27%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 0.29%), and no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (35.0% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 14.3%), college, under 1 year (54.4% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 12.7%), and college, 1 year or more (48.5% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.18%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 14.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.0%), and female disability (12.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.54%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.74%), and disability age over 75 (50.5% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 2.3%).