Immigrants from Uruguay vs Bangladeshi Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 65,003,183 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.916. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.411% in Bangladeshis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 411.5 Bangladeshis.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,997 compared to $35,897, a difference of 22.6%), median male earnings ($52,860 compared to $46,744, a difference of 13.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,171 compared to $81,363, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,975 compared to $54,719, a difference of 4.1%), median female earnings ($38,945 compared to $35,960, a difference of 8.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $47,589, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 20.1%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 19.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 2.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 27.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 25.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.97%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 42.5%, a difference of 23.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 26.5%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 20.8%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.57%), births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and married-couple households (44.5% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 39.6%), no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 37.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 27.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 52.3%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 47.6%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (92.5% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.38%), 9th grade (93.8% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.40%), and 11th grade (91.3% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 31.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.1%).