Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Bangladeshi Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,449,612 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis within Immigrant from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.055% in Bangladeshis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago corresponds to a decrease of 55.5 Bangladeshis.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,476 compared to $35,897, a difference of 15.5%), wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 14.6%), and median female earnings ($40,895 compared to $35,960, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,598 compared to $54,719, a difference of 1.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,347 compared to $86,402, a difference of 5.7%), and median family income ($93,988 compared to $88,358, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 31.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 26.0%), and single female poverty (20.9% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.50%), single male poverty (12.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 36.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 28.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 42.5%, a difference of 40.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 9.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.8% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 41.8%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 14.2%), and single mother households (7.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.13%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.53%), and average family size (3.33 compared to 3.37, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 184.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 83.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 63.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.8% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 19.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.3% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 45.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 63.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 34.8%), no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 34.3%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (90.9% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.080%), 12th grade, no diploma (89.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.080%), and 9th grade (93.6% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 27.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 24.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.6%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.0%).