Australian vs Guyanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 108,106,173 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Guyanese within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.373. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.119% in Guyanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 119.3 Guyanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 53.9%), per capita income ($52,074 compared to $40,949, a difference of 27.2%), and median family income ($118,440 compared to $93,373, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $55,210, a difference of 2.7%), median female earnings ($43,308 compared to $40,973, a difference of 5.7%), and median earnings ($52,294 compared to $45,470, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 73.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 50.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.1%), single female poverty (20.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 46.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 45.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 6.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 37.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 36.5%), births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 19.1%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 41.4%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 190.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 88.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 75.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 70.8%, a difference of 27.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 60.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 75.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 87.7%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 73.7%), and professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 38.5%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 36.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.5%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.5%).