Australian vs Slovak Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,844,942 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Slovaks within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.520. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.335% in Slovaks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 334.8 Slovaks.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $44,229, a difference of 17.7%), median household income ($96,490 compared to $83,798, a difference of 15.1%), and median family income ($118,440 compared to $103,729, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 2.5%), householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $49,753, a difference of 8.0%), and median female earnings ($43,308 compared to $39,029, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 22.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 13.8%), and receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and poverty (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 19.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 18.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.70%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 13.0%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 0.45%), family households (62.8% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.74%), and currently married (47.6% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 22.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 0.080%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 37.7%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 33.1%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 23.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.3%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 0.39%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 4.5%).