Australian vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,746,552 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.043. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to a decrease of 5.5 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $45,804, a difference of 13.7%), median male earnings ($62,857 compared to $56,302, a difference of 11.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,912 compared to $98,586, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $65,854, a difference of 1.6%), householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $51,259, a difference of 4.8%), and median female earnings ($43,308 compared to $40,798, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and single female poverty (20.3% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.27%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.86%), and single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 14.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.20%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.8%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.020%), currently married (47.6% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 0.79%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.99%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.3%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 6.8%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.1% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 0.060%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 17.3%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 11.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.75%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.6%).