Australian vs Malaysian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,507,991 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.129% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 128.8 Malaysians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $39,194, a difference of 32.9%), median family income ($118,440 compared to $95,230, a difference of 24.4%), and median male earnings ($62,857 compared to $50,772, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $51,615, a difference of 4.1%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 12.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $58,244, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 32.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.1%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.23%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.5%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.36%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 31.2%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 25.5%), and births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.3%), currently married (47.6% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 31.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 5.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 73.5%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 71.1%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 64.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 16.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 15.3%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.49%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and male disability (11.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.1%).