Australian vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,558,172 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.584. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.800% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 799.8 Immigrants from Nicaragua.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $38,065, a difference of 36.8%), median family income ($118,440 compared to $88,267, a difference of 34.2%), and median male earnings ($62,857 compared to $47,482, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $53,266, a difference of 0.89%), median female earnings ($43,308 compared to $36,023, a difference of 20.2%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 22.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 79.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 64.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 60.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.1%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and single female poverty (20.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 12.6%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.70%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 19.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 33.4%), births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 28.6%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.6%), married-couple households (47.4% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and family households (62.8% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.090%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 90.0%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 76.4%), and professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 57.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 19.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 19.2%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability (11.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.1%).