Australian vs Navajo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,506,346 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.551. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.209% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 208.9 Navajo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $29,031, a difference of 79.4%), median family income ($118,440 compared to $70,989, a difference of 66.8%), and median household income ($96,490 compared to $59,159, a difference of 63.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 26.0%), householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $42,380, a difference of 26.8%), and median female earnings ($43,308 compared to $33,046, a difference of 31.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 174.9%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 140.5%), and receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 118.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 42.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 45.9%), and single female poverty (20.3% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 55.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 109.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 98.7%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 96.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 29.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 31.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 17.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 16.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 13.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 74.4%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 58.8%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.090%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.93%), and family households (62.8% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 25.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 10.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.84%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 104.9%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 95.1%), and bachelor's degree (44.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 86.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.47%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.47%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 52.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 51.3%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 46.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 19.5%).