Australian vs Yakama Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,544,531 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.204. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.085% in Yakama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 84.8 Yakama.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $33,009, a difference of 57.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,912 compared to $76,226, a difference of 41.6%), and median family income ($118,440 compared to $83,932, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $54,321, a difference of 1.1%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 18.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $56,234, a difference of 19.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 122.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 107.8%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 67.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 15.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 22.0%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 26.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 110.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 85.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 83.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 16.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 92.4%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 51.0%), and births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.6%), married-couple households (47.4% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and currently married (47.6% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 97.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 54.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 52.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 14.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 52.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 119.6%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 94.4%), and professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 91.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.00%, a difference of 38.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 34.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.5%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 12.3%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 12.8%).